Friday, December 20, 2019
Perfection Is Not Immutable What Is Perfection
If someone is to ask a class in the 90ââ¬â¢s, the question ââ¬Å"what is perfection?â⬠, the answers are very much bound to be different from each individual in the class. If you then ask a class now in this century ââ¬Å"what is perfection?â⬠again the answers will be different from those in the 90ââ¬â¢s and unique and distinct from the other individuals in that class. Perfection does not necessarily include immutability. The notion of perfection is ever-changing and so this makes it almost impossible to have the perfect being be immutable. To be the perfect being, one must know what perfection is. Perfection is not immutable, the definition of perfection is constantly changing, and so the definition of Godââ¬â¢s perfection must also being constantly changing in order to stay in terms with what perfection is believed to be. What perfection is, is constantly different for each individual, and for God to be perfect as our superior, God must be perfect in all ways w e believe are perfect. If this becomes false, how is God really perfect (Quinn Taliaferro, 1999)? Although the arguments on why it would make sense for God to be immutable may be convincing it is important then to see if these arguments can be contradictory, which I believe they can. The argument regarding Godââ¬â¢s absolute perfection is claiming that God cannot change because God is already perfect, if God is perfect then there is no need for change (Quinn Taliaferro, 1999). Although, whens looking at this argument one can question,Show MoreRelatedDescartes Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God1302 Words à |à 6 Pagesworld existence. Descartes argument for the existence of God relies on two key assertions: 1. His understanding of God as an infinite, independent being. 2. His claim that existence is a perfection. In Meditation III, Descartes clarifies his understanding of God to be ââ¬Å"a substance that is infinite, eternal, immutable, independent, supremely intelligent, supremely powerful, and which created both myself and everything else (if anything else there be) that exists.â⬠It is important to note that in speakingRead More Descartes Meditations Ontological Argument Essay1010 Words à |à 5 PagesArgument Descartess fifth Meditation argument for Gods existence relies on an untenable notion that existence is a perfection and that it can be predicated of God. I shall first explain what Descartess argument for Gods existence is, and then present his argument in propositional form. I will then attempt to support the argument that existence is neither a perfection nor a predicate of God. In our thoughts we apprehend ideas of things. These ideas may reside entirely within our thoughtsRead MoreThe Influence of Platos Theories on Chrisianity1169 Words à |à 5 Pagesdiscussed in Phaedo, Plato asserts that the Theory of Forms is an answer to the questions about the universe. British philosopher Gilbert Ryle offers this definition: ââ¬Å"A general idea or concept, according to this new doctrine (Theory of Forms), is immutable, timeless, one over many, intellectually apprehensible and capable of precise definition at the end of a piece of ratiocination because it is an independently existing real thing or entity.â⬠The world is made of infallible truths, otherwise knownRead MoreDescartes: Meditation Iii Summary Essay836 Words à |à 4 PagesJuliana Tabor Professor Webb Introduction to Philosophy 4/1/13 Descartes: Meditations 3 In Descartesââ¬â¢s Meditations III, the Meditator describes his idea of God as a substance that is infinite, eternal, immutable, independent, supremely intelligent, supremely powerful, and which created both myself and everything else.(70) Thus, due to his opinion in regards to the idea of God, the Meditator views God containing a far more objective reality than a formal one. Due to the idea that of GodRead MoreEssay about Response to an Athiest1362 Words à |à 6 PagesResponse to an atheist 1. McCloskey refers to the arguments as ââ¬Å"proofsâ⬠and often implies that they canââ¬â¢t definitively establish the case for God, so therefore they should be abandoned. What would you say about this in light of my comments on the approaches to the arguments in the PointeCast presentation (Lesson 18)? 2. On the Cosmological Argument: McCloskey claims that the ââ¬Å"mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing inRead MoreWhat Is Wrong With Descartes Causal Proof Of God1252 Words à |à 6 PagesWhat is Wrong with Descartesââ¬â¢ Causal Proof of God Reneà Descartes was born on 31 March 1596 in La Haye, France; a city which was later renamed as ââ¬Å"Descartesâ⬠in his honor. his early life was not well documented until 1960, but it is known that he was familiar with mathematics and philosophy (Hatfield). Sometimes described as ââ¬Å"The Father of Modern Philosophyâ⬠, not only considered a great philosopher, but also a great mathematician, contributed greatly for both areas ââ¬â Cartesian geometry, for instanceRead MoreThe Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God1509 Words à |à 7 Pagesof ontology that posits the existence of God as necessity by virtue of its definition. In other words, for the mind to conceive of an infinite, perfect God, ultimately implies that there must indeed be a perfect God that embodies existence, for perfection cannot merely exist as a mental phenomenon. God is, according to Anselm, self-evident in the mind. Criticisms to this argument can be found in Anselmââ¬â¢s contempora ry, Gaunilo, who argues that such an argument can be used to - put one way - defineRead More Third Meditation:The Existence of God Essay1124 Words à |à 5 PagesIn the Third Meditation, entitled ââ¬Å"Of God: That He Existsâ⬠, Rene Descartes presents an argument for the existence of God. Meditation III talks about what is real and how to justify it. Descartes acknowledges of being doubtful of bodily things but is absolutely assured that he exists and he clearly and distinctly perceives this fact. As he confirms: I am a thinking (conscious) thing, that is, a being who doubts, affirms, denies, knows a few objects, and is ignorant of many, - [who loves, hates],Read More How Descartes Tries to Extricate Himself from the Skeptical Doubts He Has Raised4647 Words à |à 19 PagesHow Descartes Tries to Extricate Himself from the Skeptical Doubts He Has Raised [All page references and quotations from the Meditations are taken from the 1995 Everyman edition] In the Meditations, Descartes embarks upon what Bernard Williams has called the project of Pure Enquiry to discover certain, indubitable foundations for knowledge. By subjecting everything to doubt Descartes hoped to discover whatever was immune to it. In order to best understand how and why DescartesRead MoreThe Philosophy Of Religion : Thomas Aquinas And Fredrich Nietzsche1364 Words à |à 6 Pagesthis; However, philosophers have developed theories and guidelines to help people to realize what is most suitable, important, and critical in their spiritual lives. However, the Philosophy of Religion caters to everyone, not just believers. Today we will look at Thomas Aquinas and Fredrich Nietzsche and their takes on religion. To fully understand their viewpoints its important to first understand what the philosophy of religion entails. The philosophy of religion is the philosophical study of
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.